Photo 14 Jan Sunrise and moonset (Photo by natts)

Sunrise and moonset (Photo by natts)

Photo 3 Jan 257 notes comicsalliance:

The United States Government Debates Whether the X-Men Are Human Beings… In Real Life
By Chris Sims
If you’ve ever read Marvel’s X-Men comics — and let’s be honest, you have — you’re probably already aware that the central conflict of the story involves the struggle of mutants to gain acceptance in the world of humans that hates and fears them. Since the series first began, the struggle for Mutant Rights has been the story of the franchise, reflecting the battle for civil rights that every minority group has faced in history. What you might not know, however, is that there was a time when the United States Government was called upon to rule on whether Marvel’s mutants were considered to be human beings or not in real life. It’s reported on this week’s edition of the Radiolab podcast, and as you might expect, it all started with taxes.
You can listen to the fascinating story above  — including a few thoughts on the case from X-Men movie director Bryan Singer — and it’s well worth 18 minutes of your time. The short version is that tariff law classifies toys into two different categories. Anything that’s brought into the country for a kid to play with is either a doll, which includes anything that represents a human being, or a toy, which covers anything that’s not. It might seem like a small distinction — especially when I’m sure some of you are out there shouting “they’re action figures!” — but the fact is that the import tax on dolls is twice what it is for toys. Back in the ’90s, when Toy Biz was making so much money off of X-Men action figures that it was able to actually buy Marvel comics at one point, this was a pretty big deal. But the thing about those lucrative X-Men toys is that they’re not based on “humans” — or at least, they’re not based on homo sapiens. So armed with that distinction, trade lawyers Sherry Singer and Indie Singh went to the customs office to take up the proud tradition of Bolivar Trask and argue that mutants are not, in fact, human beings, and should not be treated as such. The result was a court case that lasted for years and turned into a hilarious / eerie / hilariously eerie reflection of the struggle that goes on in the comics. Characters that didn’t look human, like Beast, were judged by their appearance, while — in one of the best moments in the history of United States Law — the court found that it could not rule out the possibility that Wolverine could represent a future evolution for humans. In the end — Spoiler Warning! — the court found that mutants are not human. While Marvel benefits to the tune of tens of thousands of dollars in reduced import taxes — and Singer and Singh are quick to point out that they are in no way debating the civil rights metaphor that exists in the comics — I can’t help but be a little disheartened by that ruling. I mean, even if it’s just in reference to toys, it is actually now part of real-life U.S. Law that people born with the strange and unusual powers granted by the X-Gene aren’t considered human, and I think we all know where that story ends up.

 Magneto was right, y’all. About international trade taxes, at least.

comicsalliance:

The United States Government Debates Whether the X-Men Are Human Beings… In Real Life

By Chris Sims

If you’ve ever read Marvel’s X-Men comics — and let’s be honest, you have — you’re probably already aware that the central conflict of the story involves the struggle of mutants to gain acceptance in the world of humans that hates and fears them. Since the series first began, the struggle for Mutant Rights has been the story of the franchise, reflecting the battle for civil rights that every minority group has faced in history. What you might not know, however, is that there was a time when the United States Government was called upon to rule on whether Marvel’s mutants were considered to be human beings or not in real life.

It’s reported on this week’s edition of the Radiolab podcast, and as you might expect, it all started with taxes.

You can listen to the fascinating story above — including a few thoughts on the case from X-Men movie director Bryan Singer — and it’s well worth 18 minutes of your time. The short version is that tariff law classifies toys into two different categories. Anything that’s brought into the country for a kid to play with is either a doll, which includes anything that represents a human being, or a toy, which covers anything that’s not. It might seem like a small distinction — especially when I’m sure some of you are out there shouting “they’re action figures!” — but the fact is that the import tax on dolls is twice what it is for toys.

Back in the ’90s, when Toy Biz was making so much money off of X-Men action figures that it was able to actually buy Marvel comics at one point, this was a pretty big deal. But the thing about those lucrative X-Men toys is that they’re not based on “humans” — or at least, they’re not based on homo sapiens. So armed with that distinction, trade lawyers Sherry Singer and Indie Singh went to the customs office to take up the proud tradition of Bolivar Trask and argue that mutants are not, in fact, human beings, and should not be treated as such.

The result was a court case that lasted for years and turned into a hilarious / eerie / hilariously eerie reflection of the struggle that goes on in the comics. Characters that didn’t look human, like Beast, were judged by their appearance, while — in one of the best moments in the history of United States Law — the court found that it could not rule out the possibility that Wolverine could represent a future evolution for humans.

In the end — Spoiler Warning! — the court found that mutants are not human. While Marvel benefits to the tune of tens of thousands of dollars in reduced import taxes — and Singer and Singh are quick to point out that they are in no way debating the civil rights metaphor that exists in the comics — I can’t help but be a little disheartened by that ruling.

I mean, even if it’s just in reference to toys, it is actually now part of real-life U.S. Law that people born with the strange and unusual powers granted by the X-Gene aren’t considered human, and I think we all know where that story ends up.



Magneto was right, y’all. About international trade taxes, at least.

Photo 28 Dec 680 notes friendlyatheist:

Says the man with the gold scepter, the embroidered hat and the superficial glitter on his robe. -FA

friendlyatheist:

Says the man with the gold scepter, the embroidered hat and the superficial glitter on his robe.

-FA

Link 10 Dec Ceremonies Volunteer Performer - registration of interest | Get involved | London 2012»

Men of London! The London 2012 Olympic Ceremonies organisers have re-opened the applications to audition for the Olympic Ceremonies. Having completed their first phase of auditions, they now need more men – particularly “if they have rhythm”… so if you or a brother/son/father/uncle could be interested in joining the Olympic experience you/he can apply and find out more about the commitments involved: ceremonies application

Photo 10 Dec @KatherinePoole and friends (Photo by natts)

@KatherinePoole and friends (Photo by natts)

Link 8 Dec Comic Sans Project»

We are the Comic Sans defenders. We fear no fonts and we will make the whole world Comic Sans. Because Helvetica is sooo 2011

Photo 7 Dec Photo by natts
Photo 7 Dec Photo by natts
Photo 7 Dec Photo by natts
Photo 7 Dec Photo by natts
Photo 7 Dec Photo by natts
Link 6 Dec Play pass the parcel for a complimentary gift»

Yummy… Wait! What’s this? A Parcel? From Ping Pong? But… do I hear music? Quick, you’ve got to pass it on! When you do, you get a snazzy voucher… and if you and your chums have made the most passes when the times up, then you’ll win a Chinese New Year Party! Onwards - there’s not much time! Pass, pass and pass again, until the music stops!

Link 6 Dec 10:10 Lighter Later - Change the clocks and put an end to daylight robbery»

just e-mailed his MP, Jim Fitzpatrick, to ask him to support this campaign in UK Parliament. I hope you will too! What a difference an hour makes. Putting the clocks back is pure daylight robbery - why change our clocks so we get less light in our lives? Lighter Later is a campaign to brighten all of our days, by changing the clocks so we are up and about when the sun is out.

Photo 5 Dec Cupcakes at #TechMAP  (Photo by natts)

Cupcakes at #TechMAP (Photo by natts)

Photo 5 Dec My boss is so weird… he still uses Google+?  (Photo by natts)

My boss is so weird… he still uses Google+? (Photo by natts)


Design crafted by Prashanth Kamalakanthan. Powered by Tumblr.